Hate speech and France's court of cassation (doi:10.5064/F6833Q5K)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

(external link)

Document Description

Citation

Title:

Hate speech and France's court of cassation

Identification Number:

doi:10.5064/F6833Q5K

Distributor:

Qualitative Data Repository

Date of Distribution:

2017-08-16

Version:

1

Bibliographic Citation:

Bleich, Erik. 2017. "Hate speech and France's court of cassation". Qualitative Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.5064/F6833Q5K. QDR Main Collection. V1

Study Description

Citation

Title:

Hate speech and France's court of cassation

Identification Number:

doi:10.5064/F6833Q5K

Identification Number:

QDR:10084

Authoring Entity:

Bleich, Erik (Department of Political Science, Middlebury College)

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Zoe Hamilton

Distributor:

Qualitative Data Repository

Distributor:

Qualitative Data Repository

Access Authority:

Bleich, Erik

Depositor:

Bleich, Erik

Date of Deposit:

2017

Holdings Information:

https://doi.org/10.5064/F6833Q5K

Study Scope

Keywords:

Social Sciences, courts, hate speech, institutionalism, interviews, judicial decisionmaking

Abstract:

<h3>Project Summary</h3> <p>This project was designed to identify the factors that influenced French Court of Cassation (the Supreme Court for criminal law) decisions in hate speech cases. We identified all 103 substantive hate speech cases reviewed by the Court of Cassation between the inception of a major anti-racism law in 1972 and the end of 2012. We then identified categories of interviewees distributed across different types (judges, prosecutors, lawyers, NGOs, academics). We combined the information gathered from these interviews with information from the written court decisions as well as archival information detailing some internal deliberations of the court. The main conclusion of the research is that French judges are influenced to a significant degree by the social identity of the victim group, but that this influence has shifted over time. In general, the court has been much more apt to uphold convictions if the targets of the hate speech were understood as vulnerable minorities who are victims of "true racism" than if the targets were societal majorities such as whites, Catholics, Christians, or "French."</p> <h3>Data Abstract</h3> <p>Interviewees were selected according to procedures outlined in Bleich & Pekkanen (2013). Interviews were conducted in France, primarily between July 2014 and July 2015. Most were done in person, though some are phone interviews and some were email exchanges. Most interview records submitted here are the author's summaries of the interviews rather than transcripts. They are based on simultaneous note-taking supplemented by post-interview additions and edits. A few have been edited after the fact based on the interviewee's reading of the notes and amendments. The interview data was one key portion of evidence assembled to address the question of how the French high court decided hate speech cases. Written French court decisions are typically short, and do not contain as much information as, for example, US Supreme Court decisions, nor do they contain information about divisions within the court. So the interview data reveals information that goes beyond what is available in the written record. In addition, I relied on information on internal deliberations by court-appointed representatives (judges and prosecutors) derived from an archive for which I was granted access permission. I do not have permission to share this information, nor to reproduce the original court decisions.</p>

Time Period:

1972-07-01-2012-12-31

Date of Collection:

2012-09-01-2016-05-30

Kind of Data:

interview transcripts

Methodology and Processing

Sources Statement

Data Access

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Citation

Title:

Bleich, Erik. 2018. “Historical Institutionalism and Judicial Decision-Making: Ideas, Institutions, and Actors in French High Court Hate Speech Rulings,” <i>World Politics</i>, 70 (1): 53-85.

Identification Number:

10.1017/S0043887117000272

Bibliographic Citation:

Bleich, Erik. 2018. “Historical Institutionalism and Judicial Decision-Making: Ideas, Institutions, and Actors in French High Court Hate Speech Rulings,” <i>World Politics</i>, 70 (1): 53-85.

Citation

Title:

<p>Bleich, Erik, and Robert Pekkanen. 2013. "How to Report Interview Data." In <i>Interview Research in Political Science</i>, edited by Layna Mosley, 84-105. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.</p>

Identification Number:

978-0-8014-5194-2

Bibliographic Citation:

<p>Bleich, Erik, and Robert Pekkanen. 2013. "How to Report Interview Data." In <i>Interview Research in Political Science</i>, edited by Layna Mosley, 84-105. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.</p>

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

0_Bleich_Interview Permissions.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

0_Bleich_Interviews Methods Table.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

0_README_Bleich.txt

Notes:

text/plain

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Antony Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Bailly Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Boigeol Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Denise Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Douvreleur Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Garapon Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Henon Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Johannès Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Latraverse Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Lefranc Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Monfort Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Philippe Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Quintard Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Ronsin Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Salas Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Siredy-Garnier Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf

Other Study-Related Materials

Label:

Bleich_Stone Final.pdf

Notes:

application/pdf