71 to 80 of 366 Results
Adobe PDF - 82.1 KB -
SHA512: b6ba4ad72d088794b453b5dffc8923e382a1a26b0504111152fa1c288eed1341d2077a46fb15d6640922393e1b02035b24f03d0aa7ffc7b3461903bc74bf2318
|
Adobe PDF - 54.5 KB -
SHA512: a786cbdc3b837d4b36759191c8fc365068bdc7800b1181de08bb3e1db4face7c8a76347400fe98e9cba3301179e434bbe81f58714141e72c4919f58495cfebf5
|
Plain Text - 4.5 KB -
SHA512: abc471c451466d2907b8014ad82ab6b295d1d8983a786f265e89b0c6c1f320fb66861b6ce640f8bff4681b8d3a354532df00e830b7d2e3da4bcd4bfe7e2a74bc
|
Oct 18, 2022
Hickner, Andy. 2022. "Data for "How do search systems impact systematic searching? A qualitative study"". Qualitative Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.5064/F68AAMX3. QDR Main Collection. V1
Project Summary Objectives: Systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis projects require systematic search methods. Search systems require several essential attributes in order to support systematic search method; however, many systems used in evidence synthesis fail to meet one or more of these requirements. A qualitative study was undertaken...
|
Tabular Data - 192.7 KB - 3 Variables, 327 Observations - UNF:6:0yVJCK5b4L+NzFQK+2OBLQ==
|
Comma Separated Values - 8.4 KB -
SHA512: 7e7f0cc5dedb88693ca306955111e6275356893610b3be50d962ed3636c6070a3a2550e5497f29f62de0fd149b3334fc363f7d417c02fb3e1191aaf7dd36de92
|
Adobe PDF - 213.9 KB -
SHA512: 98935ea3d7079fa5f116d188fdb49477244c6c63ef01f27ea2eb3b213fee50e40d12b3df7c9a1c2ae693e75da7b05fda57e1747acc0b69d5e4762fc78b76cc45
|
Adobe PDF - 119.8 KB -
SHA512: 292e1ca63968cb2c52506a3e816d9fec06c064f45b490af3b49191ef7579a8f3cfd572577436f250cd17166aab51fe9489253c660debb546f6bd5bc8529e16e1
|
Adobe PDF - 110.5 KB -
SHA512: 8b9001d826c0b89fc92295ae5bbad1493f9694c9dfe63e10cdebb84797dbc89836a7240579db52193810a64de66e140465fca71d8c8c8c9969e9ca5e19dfc0f5
|
Adobe PDF - 92.1 KB -
SHA512: c17fbcef255195b34f3b677d5572120671d12507866e9ba50d1212851231f57a06b7933b146b1b47e54c89fd285028e736e10e1854091165f59f4a89d388506a
|
- 6
- 7
- 8 (Current)
- 9
- 10